Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/daytonc/www/blog/wp-includes/cache.php on line 33

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/daytonc/www/blog/wp-includes/cache.php:33) in /home/daytonc/www/blog/wp-commentsrss2.php on line 8
http://blog.daytonc.com/archives/215 if a thing is worth doing, it is worth doing badly Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:55:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6 http://blog.daytonc.com/archives/215#comment-1078 Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:18:16 +0000 http://blog.daytonc.com/archives/215#comment-1078 If a thing is worth doing, it's worth doing period. If a thing is worth doing, it’s worth doing period.

]]> http://blog.daytonc.com/archives/215#comment-1040 Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:54:05 +0000 http://blog.daytonc.com/archives/215#comment-1040 I can't believe I stayed up late for that crap I can’t believe I stayed up late for that crap

]]> http://blog.daytonc.com/archives/215#comment-1036 Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:10:31 +0000 http://blog.daytonc.com/archives/215#comment-1036 Do you think Chesterton was aware of the Shaker saying that is roughly the "opposite" of his quote? A thing worth doing is worth doing well? Do you think Chesterton was aware of the Shaker saying that is roughly the “opposite” of his quote? A thing worth doing is worth doing well?

]]>